Do you have news to tell us? Send your e.mails with news and inquiries to: w.nation@mail.com
Register with us for free to follow our news on the right-hand tab
Article compiled and posted by: White Nation correspondent Johannesburg July 27 2019
SOUTH AFRICA– THE PIRATE’s REALM DOWN SOUTH
SOUTH AFRICA is entrapped in a silent war with itself. The people of South Africa is at war against their ruling regime that exploits them for their votes, illegal rates and taxes – and poor service delivery. The communist regime is at war with it’s people to disown them and abuse them in favor of the international corporate vultures such as China. The leftist globalist newspapers is at war against the white Afrikaner , the Indian and the colored minorities and visa versa. The police is at war with gangsters in the Western Cape. The radical ultra leftist politicians such as the EFF and Union bosses is at war against the capitalist corporate “deep state ” they call the “white money capitol.”
The Nguni tribes on their turn is at war against each other for tribal dominance for political power. The ruling regime is at war with itself between the current Venda usurpers- and the previous Zulu mafia. Underneath the fake cloak “democracy” the war for control of the illegal ANC, regime and state resources is raging. This week alone two ANC big shots have been shot dead in Limpopo in what is believed to be part of the continuous in-fighting which has claimed several lives of the polatriat party members in the past 12 months. Valtyn Kekana, 54, who was chairperson of municipal public accounts committee in the Mogalakwena municipality, and Alf Kanyane, 32, who was the party’s branch secretary in the region, were shot dead in Mokopane by gunmen on Tuesday. The polatriat’s provincial spokesperson Donald Selamolela hinted that the shooting may be politically motivated.
Slogging it out top-sides…one BOSASA scandal after the other Gupta scandal
The slogging war between the top “clique” and the public prosecutor continues. First she attacked the Squirrel for his son’s part in the BOSASA/Watson scandal. Now the Public Protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane, will square off against the “Squirrel” Ramaphosa, a mere 24-hours after getting a bloody nose in the North Gauteng High Court. On Monday, her remedial action relating to the so-called SARS rogue unit was found to be nonsensical. Now, she faces the Squirrel in the same court but on a separate matter. It’s about Mkhwebane’s finding that Pravin Gordhan wasn’t authorized to approve the former SARS deputy commissioner’s early retirement with full pension benefits. The Squirrel says he was forced to approach the court because he doesn’t want to discipline Minister Pravin Gordhan now, on the Ivan Pillay pension payout saga. He wants to wait for the outcome of the review application by the minister. He says he doesn’t think Gordhan’s application is frivolous, and therefore doesn’t want to take an irrational decision that would be susceptible to litigation. According to the Squirrel, if Gordhan succeeds in the review application, it would not be lawful to discipline him, as directed by the remedial action. The Public Protector has repeatedly argued that her remedial actions are binding and can’t be ignored.
Mkhwebane reckons she has been given a raw deal by journalists, who keep trying to link the head of the anti-corruption body to the Gupta family at the centre of the state capture scandal. However, it’s hard to imagine that Mkhwebane is an innocent who is doing her utmost to fight for truth and justice in South Africa. This is because she was appointed to this anti-corruption role when former president Jacob Zuma was still clinging to power and had surrounded himself with friends. In addition, Mkhwebane has concentrated on trying to pin dirt on anyone BUT Zuma and his friends while in office, even though there is a surfeit of evidence in the public domain of industrial-scale state capture and corruption. Global journalists have evidence that HSBC has joined the dots from Mkhwebane to the Gupta family. Unsurprisingly, Mkhwebane has “rejected with contempt” the details in the report.
The ANC can sometimes appear so divided that its National Executive Committee (NEC) runs out of words trying to express something important while creating no internal waves wrote the Daily Maverick. The statement released after the NEC meeting that ended on Monday July 29 demonstrates this. The party now wants an “expedited solution” to the e-tolls problems and, at the same time, to “reaffirm the user-pay principle”. It wants to create the impression that action is being taken against an official who worked with an opposition party and yet that person is not going before a disciplinary hearing. It wants to make some comment about the public protector when it is obvious that it is divided on the issue and so offers “principled support to the Office of the Public Protector” that is pursuing its leader, and to “the judiciary” that could well overrule that office.
Despite this continuous balancing act, there are indications of a slow shift in the balance of power away from ANC Secretary-General Ace Magashule and towards Cyril Ramaphosa. This NEC meeting that started on Friday was foregrounded by an incendiary statement in which Magashule claimed that NEC member (and former tourism minister) Derek Hanekom was a “charlatan” and a “wedge-driver”. The timing of the statement (Thursday, 11.28pm) led to suspicions that Magashule had not consulted with any of the top officials before releasing it, and had only spoken to people in his own office (which would include Carl Niehaus). That Magashule released this statement without consulting other officials would appear to have been proved by the NEC saying: “The issue of allegations against Cde Derek Hanekom was also raised in the meeting. The NEC referred the matter to officials for processing.”
A man described by Magashule as a “charlatan” for allegedly working with the EFF to remove then-president Jacob Zuma in 2017 is not being summoned to a disciplinary hearing. And such is the balance of power in the top six national mobsters that it seems unlikely Hanekom will face any sanction at all (it should not be forgotten that were charges to be moved against Hanekom, Zuma could also face charges for his meeting with Black First Land First during the election period). From this, it appears Magashule’s authority has been dimmed somewhat. At the very least, it demonstrates that he does not have the power to follow through with what he appeared to be promising in his statement of last week.If there is one thing the ANC’s communication machinery has become good at, it’s confirming what every voter knows, without actually naming names. This time is no different. The NEC refers to its intention to restore the unity of the party before saying that it “recognized that there is certain persistent behaviour, particularly at leadership levels, which undermines this program. These include factionalism, untested and wild accusations, use of social media to attack each other and policy positions of the ANC, leaks to media and taking the organisation to court without first exhausting internal processes.”
As anyone on Twitter knows, NEC mob like to spend time fighting with each other. If it’s not Tony Yengeni tweeting pictures of the ANC constitution and claiming it will be “thrown in someone’s face” before an NEC meeting, it’s Finance Minister Tito Mboweni lambasting those who want to change the Reserve Bank’s mandate (or just learn how to cook). Soon before the NEC meeting, Zuma tweeted that he believed Hanekom was a spy, with no evidence to back up his claim (this brings to three the number of people that Zuma “believes” are or were spies that he appointed to his Cabinets). Despite this context, despite it being obvious who is being discussed, the NEC – because of the politics of the situation – cannot bring itself to name names. While it is not the only political formation in the world that has had this problem, it gives the impression it is too weak to grasp an important nettle. The balance of mob power also appears to be shifting slightly even when it comes to the situation around the SA Reserve Bank (SARB). Magashule had put intense pressure on Ramaphosa’s faction by saying the mandate of the bank should change and that there should be “quantity easing” as part of our monetary policy.
In the end, the NEC simply appeared to copy the text of the Nasrec Conference’s resolution, “to return the sovereignty of this important national institution to the people of South Africa as a whole”. But it then went on to balance out the political factions by quoting the Constitution and the fact that the SARB has operational independence. In other words, the situation appears to have not changed in this regard. Which again suggests that Magashule has not been able to have his way – at least for the moment. Such is the situation in the ANC that it appears a movement that was able to win the liberation of this country is unable to solve the governance problem that is e-tolls. The debt that was incurred by the government for Gauteng’s highways continues to rise, and the percentage of people who pay to use the highways appears only to fall. This situation is not going to improve. The Gauteng ANC has pushed consistently against e-tolls, to the point where it has held protests against its own national leaders. Mboweni has said that the user-pay principle must apply, and people who use infrastructure must pay for it. Talks to find a solution to this problem are supposed to be underway. Mboweni may have more political power than previously thought. While he was derided by some leaders for his statements (again, this ended up on Twitter), the NEC itself called for both “an expedited solution” and affirmed the “user-pay principle”.
None of this makes sense. A cake cannot be both had and eaten, yet the party appears to be trying to do just this. The situation will not improve, a solution will not appear out of thin air. The scale of Eskom’s losses and the problems in other SOEs means there is no money to repay the e-tolls debt. And the users will not pay. Wishing it will not make it so. Which means that the situation is likely to get worse before any solution can be found. The main issue facing South Africa, the huge and increasing unemployment rate – it hit an 11-year high this week of 29%, with youth unemployment at 56% – is another example of a problem it appears the ANC cannot resolve. While the party does talk about this problem and calls on all South Africans to be “part of this national effort to accelerate inclusive growth and transformation”, no solutions are offered by the NEC. Again, jobs and the economy appear to be a victim of the party’s inability to make economic policy. While there are many reasons for this most important of problems (and a problem that entrenches racialised inequality), it is up to the ANC as the party that won the elections to find solutions. So far, it has failed to do so. Worse, no solutions are on the horizon.
Unless there is some unforeseen (and unforeseeable) wave that bolsters the global economy and picks us up with it, the number of young people sitting without a job, with hope turning to despair, is only going to rise. However, some form of economic policy could be implemented once the internal power battles in the ANC come to an end, or if one side gains ascendance. While the past performance of this NEC is not necessarily an indicator of future economic results, Ramaphosa making some progress would be great news to many. Magashule’s repeated missteps around media statements, his apparent inability to make good on his own promises, and Ramaphosa’s ability to stop any major policy changes (even if they are included in Nasrec resolutions) indicate that Ramaphosa is gaining ground. If it continues, this process could lead to improvements in governance. Ramaphosa has said he wants to create two million jobs in the next 10 years and to eradicate poverty within a generation. He will be aware that it is on these issues he will be judged. The situation in the ANC is such that making any hard and fast predictions is foolish. At the moment our politics give the impression of chaos. Creating order from this chaos is difficult. There now seem to be small glimmers of order. They are vulnerable and can be dashed at any moment. Stay tuned, stay very, very tuned.
Who is killing the blacks?
Blacks up to today contributes for the most killings among themselves- as they have done so since the 70’s in their Hostel wars and Natal Midlands wars between the Zulu and Xhosa tribes. Can we ever forget the multiple “necklace” murders – execution by ramming a car tyre over the “accused’s” head and shoulders, douse it with flammable liquid and set the poor wretch alight that was invented by Winnie Mandela – a practice still used today? They still are continuing that slaughter among themselves up to today. Whites in South Africa are continuously falsely accused that they killed “hundreds” of blacks during “apartheid.” This false rhetoric is one of the biggest propaganda lies advocated by the extremist left-wing newspapers and lapped up by all the radical black vindictive political war mongers that seek to justify their own hateful and murderous intentions . The black tribes have their own historical wars among themselves as well- as they had since the white man set foot in Africa over 400 years ago.
South Africa…a very dangerous battleground
Cyril Ramaphosa is well known for being a thief, a smuggler, callous killer ,usurper, blackmailer, terrorist, extortionist , money launderer and word spinner. It appears every time the ANC sends in a new Mobster boss he is a worse specimen than his predecessor. But behind every black dictator you will find the Jew conspirator. The close interaction between the Jew and the black African spans decades ago. Jews exploit black Africans for their own personal devious agendas.Many were Communists. Most were lawyers. A few had money. But all faced what has been described as a “double marginality”: not fully accepted as white, while also alienated from an organized Jewish community beholden to the powers that be. Jews such as Lazar Sidelsky,Nat Bregman, Arthur Goldreich, Harold Wolpe, Harry Oppenheimer, Yossel Mashel (Joe) Slovo, Ruth First , James Kantor, Helen Suzman, ( née Gavronsky) and Nadine Morimer have been lining themselves up to exploit the rise of Mandela for example. Once Mandela was pushed onto the throne these Jews made sure they occupy the most powerful positions in the new government. Jews never do something without claiming their ‘rightful” compensation.
JEWS were thick in the fry to support the communist ANC and overthrow a healthy white government. The historic first-ever meeting between Mandela and the Jewish communal leadership in June 1990. Back row, left to right: Solly Sacks (Chairman SA Zionist Federation),Abe Abrahamson (President SA Zionist Federation), Michael Katz (President SA Jewish Board of Deputies), Thabo Mbeki, Yusuf Surtees. Front, left to right: Helen Suzman, Mandela, Chief Rabbi Cyril Harris, Advocate Isie Maisels. (South African Jewish Board of Deputies)
The kenniving Jews and dodgy Ramaphosa
TODAY the Jews still are dictating the ANC from behind the curtains- but not only the ANC- most of the black political parties are deep in their pockets. For instance every single leader of the DA has been a Jew including Helen Zille, who fakes it as a Christian but in fact both her parents are German Jews who fled from Germany before WW2. Perhaps the buggers are getting holocaust pensions – I’m not kidding. 9 million Jews, including Jews born AFTER WW2 get a $2,000 per month pension from Germany to this day. One wonder how many high level Jewish conspirators in South Africa draw such pensions now? Maimane is the first “non-white” and “non-Jew” to run the DA, but rest assured the DA is 100% Jew Big Business funded. We have nothing but contempt for black Christians, which goes back to the actions of the very stupid, very weak, Bishop Abel Muzorewa, a Christian who was the first BLACK leader of Zimbabwe-Rhodesia and who then handed over the country to Mugabe, a blatant communist. If more than 70% blacks are supposed to be “Christians” – so why is the communist who worship the devil ruling the country?
It seems that Maimane has done something decent for once in his worthless life. It seems he has proof and has exposed Ramaphosa’s son as being involved in the massive VBS heist by the super-black criminals, all of them high level scum. NB: Ramaphosa is himself very dodgy. Ramaphosa and his brother are big con artists in business in South Africa. Ramaphosa and his bro have been stealing billions of Rands through their dodgy medical businesses. Other blacks have exposed this. It would not surprise me if Ramaphosa’s son had his fingers in the cookie jar … a chip off the old block I’d say. VBS has been fun because the blacks have been stealing like pigs, gorging themselves on their own bank, their own race, etc and this is one of the rare instances where everyone was caught. In the past, the dog shit worthless South African Police scum, a criminal organisation in its own right, along with Govt, etc always helped to hide black high level criminality.
Finally, some of the disgusting truth comes out. Will the young Ramaphosa be properly punished? Of course not. If true justice had to be at work in South Africa then the hangman would be busy 24/7 hanging all the garbage who need to be hanged. Here is a closeup of the deposit slip. This is definitely an FNB (First National Bank) slip. “VODS” is the FNB transaction system.

This week saw anothervote in the ANC-dominated parliament in favor of changing the South African constitution to allow for expropriation of property without compensation. On Thursday a motion to establish an ad hoc committee to draft an amendment of Section 25 of the Constitution, protecting property rights, was passed with 189 votes to 67, without any abstentions. A broad coalition of anti-white parties, including the ANC, EFF and NFP voted for the motion, while those in opposition such as the DA, IFP, FF Plus and ACDP voted against.
The ANC’s chief whip, Pemmy Majodina, introduced the motion which stated that the fifth parliament had already adopted a report by the constitutional review committee (CRC) recommending the Constitution should be amended so section 25 “makes explicit that which is implicit in the Constitution, with regards to expropriation of land without compensation, as a legitimate option for land reform, so as to address the historic wrongs caused by the arbitrary dispossession of land, and in so doing ensure equitable access to land and further empower the majority of South Africans to be productive participants in ownership, food security and agricultural reform programs”.
Agricultural reform or “land reform” in South Africa is a communist euphemism for expropriating farms belonging to whites. Prior to voting on the motion, MPs from the ANC and EFF, the latter clad in their customary red uniforms, stood up and sang some anti-white songs in the house of parliament. “We must complete this. We are hungry, we want our land back,” Majodina said after tabling the motion, to applause from the ANC and EFF. His counterpart from the opposition DA, chief whip John Steenhuisen said it was a “smokescreen for the government’s failure with land reform over the past two decades”. He added the process to change the constitution was “legally, procedurally and constitutionally flawed”. “What this motion is, it is the greatest hoax perpetrated on the people of South Africa,” Steenhuisen added.
IFP MP Elphas Buthelezi saw no justification for amending the Constitution. “The Constitution has not failed our people, it is the policies of this (ANC) government that failed our people,” he said. Pieter Groenewald, the leader of the Afrikaner party Freedom Front Plus, said that the motion should have been named “the “motion to destroy the economy and the future of South Africa”. He also felt that the radical Marxist party, the EFF, was more honest than the ANC with its pretense of “setting preconditions” to land grabbing. “The EFF is more honest than the ANC. For them, it is an ideological issue because they say they want the land,” Groenewald said.
Bennie van Zyl, general manager of TLU SA, highlighted the corruption in the Land Affairs Department. Photo: FWM
Bennie van Zyl, general manager of TAU SA, told Farmer’s Weekly that he worried about the fact that the land affairs department was mired in corruption.
Both major farmers’ unions in South Africa responded negatively to the motion. A spokeswoman for the liberal farmers’ union, Agri SA, expressed her disappointment as she had always believed that the ANC regime could expropriate without actually changing the current constitution. Agri SA is in favour of so-called “land reform” and has even offered to cooperate with the ANC. “Whether land reform will be speeded up, must be seriously questioned,” said Annalize Crosby, spokeswoman for Agri SA. “The failure of land reform has a lot to do with the bad implementation of policy and laws and inadequate budgets and little with the unwillingness of sellers (of land).”
The more conservative union, TLU SA, described the passing of the motion as “short-sighted” and “hugely irresponsible”. “Expropriation without compensation will not deliver any good results,” said Mr Louis Meintjes, the president of TLU SA. “Research shows most of the applicants do not have the knowledge or capacity to sustainably manage the land, which at the moment contributes significantly to the rural and national economy. In most cases, they would instead opt to be financially compensated than to be in charge of the land. “The past has shown us most of the land previously expropriated now lies barren because the government did not care enough to support the new owners to manage the land successfully.”











Jacob Zuma’s legacy includes a 6‚600-strong private army that costs R2.6-billion a year and is accountable to no one‚ according to new research. In a report entitled “South Africa’s Secret Police”‚ researcher Gareth van Onselen says spending on VIP protection “exploded” during Zuma’s presidency. In nine years under his predecessor‚ Thabo Mbeki‚ it cost R4.3-billion. Over the next decade‚ that rose to R18.2-billion. “Now that Cyril Ramaphosa has been elected just the first two years of his new administration will cost R5.8-billion in VIP protection‚” Van Onselen says in the new South African Institute of Race Relations report. The document bristles with statistics‚ yet Van Onselen says the budget for VIP protection is “shrouded in bureaucratic obfuscation”.
Some of the figures the report reveals include:
– 6‚585 people work for VIP protection;
– 4.4 guards are allocated to each of the 450 South African and foreign dignitaries they protect (2012/13 figure);
– 24.6 protectors guard each of the 137 residences and locations they are assigned to (2012/13);
– 47 guards are assigned to each of the 18 dignitaries covered by presidential protection services (2012/13); and
– 88 protectors are assigned to the president.
Van Onselen points out that these figures are in sharp contrast to the one police officer for every 346 citizens revealed in a parliamentary reply in 2014. In other words‚ the president’s level of protection is 30‚448 times what is available to each ordinary South African.The private security industry in South Africa is among the largest in the world, with over 9,000 registered companies, 450,000 registered active private security guards and a further 1.5 million qualified (but inactive) guards; many times the available personnel than the combined South African police and army. Now add to this all the secret military personnel the ANC is supporting and secretly training in private camps in Mozambique, Zimbabwe and Angola- and the dark military net spans across countries. And all of these illegal private armies are called “revolutionaries.” What “revolution” are the communists then preparing for if they are in control of the country? Who do they want to “revolt” against?
ADVERTISEMENT FOR BLACK RACISTS TO JOIN MILITANT EXTREMIST SHOOTING RANGE PRACTICE
” Black Centric Forum [BCF] will be Hosting a Shooting Range Session for all Members and external volunteers. You are hereby Invited to join the Training Session which Will Be Taking Place On The 3rd of August 2019 At an undisclosed Venue. Cost: R400 per Participant (Includes hiring of ammunition, 30 rounds, safety induction, ears and eyes protection kit and range hire)
Please Contact
BROTHER THABANG [065 273 1640] for More Information and Booking.”
The question is why- and for what war are they preparing this masses of illegal private military organizations? Ironically was it the British Press made one big issue of the white Commando Corps training camp for young white South Africans- and immediately(as expected)- labeled it a ” white supremacist” camp with the usual demonization rhetoric with all the fitting slanderous terms such as “racists”, ” white supremacists,”, “Neo-Nazis” and G-d knows what else they could come up with- but conveniently forget about the hundreds of illegal black military organizations running rampant in South Africa of which the EFF is the one most prominent. But then again it was the British “ establishment” themselves that funded and created the EFF- so why would they expose their own demonic agendas to destabilize South Africa and keep the communists in control? Britain’s direct influence is the one most evil force in South Africa.
and Ice For Africa . And the more these big companies close down- the more jobless potential criminals are created. SA’s official unemployment rate jumped to 29% in the second quarter of the year, the highest jobless rate since the start of 2008. South Africa became a wasteland full of rich political opportunists and poor common survivalists. The more people loose their jobs- the more the human nature to survive kicks in and the more the criminal nature take over in order to survive another day in the G-dforsaken land. Thus the communists are creating more and more criminals every day- and in South Africa- with all the criminals running rampant and hundreds of new security companies popping up- crime surely does pay!
“As Rupert thinks about leaving SA, I feel sorry for the many black owned businesses that he funds and for the Black owned NGOs that he donates to, let alone the taxes and the thousands of South Africans that he continues to employ.Not mentioning the billions that he would take out the country. Whilst some of us wish he could take us with him as the Titanic continues to sink, my heart goes out to the many Africans who had called SA home! The fall of SA will have dire consequences for the entire continent…Businesses are shutting down for various reasons…No new wealth has been created over the past 25 years. Fitch has downgraded us and guess what, the Anc is busy fighting among themselves !As if that’s not enough, LEWC is back on the table. Its impossible to be positive please forgive me. Its game over…”– Thandeka Khoza
*
Tourists now abandoning the sinking ship…
A tour guide said a number of foreigners have cancelled trips to South Africa after hearing of attacks on tourists. Over the weekend, Ukrainian Ivan Ivanov was robbed and murdered while hiking near Hout Bay. The Table Mountain Watch Group said at least 14 people were attacked in the park since January, significantly down from the 42 attacks during the same period last year. Tour guide Ida Torres said she was concerned that ongoing attacks on tourists were having a devastating impact on the industry. Late last year, she took a group of tourists to the Simons Town area and while they were having lunch, their bus was broken into and valuables were stolen. Torres said a honeymoon couple, part of the same tour group, was held at gunpoint while walking on Signal Hill. “I must be very honest, we’ve lost a lot of tourists because of the crime,” she said. Torres said she no longer allowed members of her tour groups to get off the bus while visiting the iconic Bo-Kaap community due to an apparent rise in crime in that area. She said police visibility was desperately needed in and around popular tourist spots in the Cape.
Investors now abandoning the sinking ship…..





South African farming activists are outraged at the lack of police action following a series of brutal attacks on white farmers. Many in the farming community are disturbed by a newly introduced motion that rules land can be seized without any financial recompense. Critics believe that the proposal to amend Section 25 of the constitution has enabled disgruntled members of the community to invade and steal farmland without fear of legal consequences. Civil rights organization AfriForum has alleged that there have been 109 recorded attacks so far in 2018 and 15 farm murders, which means that one white farmer has been killed every five days this year. “Our rural areas are trapped in a crime war. Although the South African government denies that a violence crisis is staring rural areas in the face, the numbers prove that excessive violence plague these areas,” said Ian Cameron, AfriForum’s Head of Safety, as reported by Newsweek. A 35-year-old farmer, Gabriel Stols, told the Independent that his brother Kyle, 21, was shot dead by four terrorists on a game reserve near Bloemfontein. “What is happening to us is torture, it is slaughter, it is brutal, it is revenge. The world doesn’t know what is happening in South Africa,” he said.
The policy was originally proposed by the leader of the far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), Julius Malema, who has insisted that it is the “right ” of black South Africans to take back the land. In a speech delivered Wednesday, Malema said it was time for the white farmers to leave. “They must leave the keys of the tractors‚ because we want to work the land,” the controversial figure declared, as reported by Times Live. “They must leave the keys of the houses‚ because we want to stay in those houses.” Mr Malema has previously described land seizures as “teaching whites a lesson.” “We must ensure that we restore the dignity of our people without compensating the criminals who stole our land,” he said in response to the motion passing by 241 votes to 83. His fiery response was, in part, as a response to remarks made by an Australian Home Affairs Minister, Peter Dutton, who has offered to explore options for issuing visas to stricken farmers.
Let’s deal with that first: very, very few descendants of the San are left in South Africa, having mostly settled in Namibia and Botswana. As for the Khoi, most fled to the Northern Cape because of the devastating effect of the smallpox epidemic in 1713 while a single tribe (the Katrivier Khoi) remained in the Western Cape where they completely integrated with the amaXhosa (Gunukwebe).Most of the Khoi then ended up with the “Basters” and Griquas.
Now that that is out of the way, let’s take a look at the “settler” and “Indian” problem, Mrr Malema and Ramaphosa:
Yes, they were the first Freeburghers, the first to claim independence from the Netherlands and Britain, the first to cultivate land and the first to settle permanently on farms, in small towns and districts. What’s more, they were an integrated community (long denied by the “racially pure” and tucked away in dark, inaccessible archives). SLAVES: You see, slaves were not Xhosas, Pedis, Zulus (which did not exist then) or Venda. Slaves were from India, Bengalia; Angola, Madagaskar and… wait for it… 32 white slaves (“knechte”) mainly from Ireland.
The first known marriage was between Jan Woutersz and Catharina Anthonis van Bengale in 1656. He was, incidentally, the caretaker of Robben Island. Next came Jan Sacharias with the Indian lady Maria, also from Bengale in 1658. Up to 1800 about 5500 to 7000 of these marriages took place. Only one marriage between white and Khoi is recorded in 1664 between Pieter van Meerhoff and Eva/Krotoa.
A high profile marriage was between Arnoldus Willemsz Basson (or Wesel) to Angela of Bengale in 1669. She became the founding mother of the Basson and many other Afrikaner families. In 1676 Cornelis Claasen married Catryn van Bengale. An indigenous nation was well on its way which would eventually culminate in Afrikaner, coloured and the Afrikaans language. Contrary to popular believe the segregation between The Hollandsche SA Natie (Afrikaners) and the “coloureds” was not so much based on race, but more on class.It so came about that some “whites” ended up as “bywoners” while some “coloureds” like Jan Bantjes became the official notary of the Great Trek and later secretary of the Zuid Afrikaansche Republic.
In 1700 Christoffel Snyman and Marguerite de Savoy van Paliacatte got married. The Indian, Salomon Jacobs married a white woman, Anna Elizabeth Zeeman.
Then came: Christiaan Bok (1713), Gerrit Romond, Hendrik Willem du Plooy, Oltman Ahlers (1780), Johann Ehrlich (1796) and Jacobus Matthiam Kluysman, who all married Indian women, followed by Paulus Hartogh in 1791 to Petronella of Bouton, Hendrik Heyns to Delia van der Storm van Batavia, Hendrik Thiart to Regina Elizabeth also van Batavia, and Gerrit Gerrits to Susanna van Bombassa. Andries Beyers married Catharina Vrijman in 1683; Matthys Greeff to Susanna Claasen; Douw Gerbrand Steyn to Maria Lozee in 1685; Dirk Pretorius to Maria Hansen; Barend Pieters Blom and Catharina de Beer/Barre; Paulus Heyns to Maria Schalk (daughter whom Willem Schalk van der Merwe fathered with a slave).
Lourens Campher and Andrie Voormeester lived with their former-slave wives in Stellenbosch and Guilliam Frisnet, Christoffel Snyman and Barend Janz van Zwolle were in Drakenstein.
And so the list of marriages and baptisms go on and on, Malema, of a truly indigenous people settling here long before you arrived – and now you have the audacity to call them “strangers” and “settlers”?
I, for one, regard myself also as an Afrikaner/Boer, speaking Afrikaans, cherishing my history and heritage and loving my people warts and all, whatever they achieved and whatever they buggered up. Indigenous like all the other later arrivals who made South Africa their home. South Africa has a wonderful history with thousands of untold stories of our different cultures and traditions; unfortunately this history had been manipulated by two consecutive governments for decades for their own political agendas. It is time to take our real history and our real South Africa back from politicians like Malema, Maimane and Ramaphosa.”








“What shocks me is the rate of deindustrialization in SA. Remember that just 25 years ago:
– We had specialist entities like USCO that made sophisticated steel used for example in gun barrels;
– We were leaders in oil from coal;
– We were the only producer of steel in Africa at Iscor;
– We made copper cables at African Cables;
– There was more energy concentration in a 100 Sq km area in Vereeniging than in any other African country’s entire energy usage per hour
– Samancor produced specialist alloy feedstock and Stewart’s and Lloyd’s manufactured a range of sophisticated products of great precision like pumps
– Dorbyl fabricated heavy engineering components;
– On the military side we were nuclear capable and on the threshold of weaponizing nuclear warheads exactly like North Korea is doing today.
All of this was possible – and I am not saying it was good or bad to be nuclear capable – only because we had sophisticated technical capacity. In two decades that world class capacity has been lost and raw sewage now floods the basements of buildings. The collapse has been total and rapid. The epicenter of the most concentrated form of primary production on the African continent has been wiped out with one sweep. The country that pioneered heart transplants now breeds new pathogens that are likely to create a health catastrophe of unprecedented proportions. This speaks to the inability of a liberation movement to govern. This is a shocking truth that few want to admit. The army that just 25 years ago produced the most sophisticated artillery, and which was at a stage considered the most advanced military force in the world after Israel and which saw the creation of an attack helicopter equal to the Apache, is now retreating from Emfuleni unable to execute the mission given to it last year.” Cry the beloved country. Soon SA will be just another African sh1th0le like Zim.” – Dr Anthony Turton, – professor at the University of the Free State
SOURCE:
White Nation
WHITE NATION– WE DO NOT HATE WHITE LIBERALS– WE SIMPLY DESPISE THE FILTH!!
C’MON- SHARE OUR LINK
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.